Image hosted by Photobucket.com

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

suburbanguerrilla@verizon.net
ATOM FEED
RSS FEED
about
home

ARCHIVES

AIR AMERICA LIVE FEED

WXPN-FM

WHOLEWHEAT RADIO

EAGLE FM ONLINE

BEATLES-A-RAMA

MY WISH LIST

A Sponsor of Cover The Uninsured Week

Support This Site

Rate Me on BlogHop.com!
the best pretty good okay pretty bad the worst help?

Blogarama

www.blogwise.com Suburban Guerrilla

[Powered by Blogger]

Reading blogs at work? Click to escape to a suitable site! Listed on BlogShares

Thursday, April 29, 2004


SELECTIVE ENFORCEMENT
Reader J.G. checks in with some more info on Massachusetts gay marriage:
You note that our esteemed Governor plans to keep out-of-state gay couples from marrying using a 1913 law, originally intended to prevent interracial couples from marrying in Massachusetts if their marriage was illegal in their home state.

As it turns out, this statute remains on the books, but -- like many other outdated laws in Mass. -- is actively not enforced:

[quoted from the Boston Globe]

Marriage eligibility wasn't enforced
Clerks in state told to skip status
By Yvonne Abraham, Globe Staff | April 28, 2004

For 27 years, the state has specifically instructed city and town clerks not to enforce eligibility requirements for marriage applicants, including a residency requirement that Governor Mitt Romney wants to use to block out-of-state gay couples from marrying in Massachusetts.

[. . .]

Apparently it's only necessary to require enforcement if a population segment is getting, ah, uppity.
But wait, I thought Massachusetts was too liberal for the rest of the country?

I'm so confused...


| |